(don't)Waste WaterSubscribe
Water Tech Business

Evove Raised $13M. Its DLE Rivals Raised 25x That. Kurita Picked Evove.

By Antoine Walter · (don't) Waste Water · 30 June 2026 · 21 min read

I keep a list of every company trying to pull lithium out of water instead of rock, and right now it runs to about forty names. The money on that list is overwhelmingly American and overwhelmingly large: Lilac Solutions has raised north of $300 million, EnergyX more than $130 million, and both spent it the conventional way, buying their own lithium sites to prove the technology on. Evove, the British outfit whose pilot I drove out to a muddy County Durham field to see this spring, has raised under $13 million in seven years and owns no lithium asset at all. It’s also the one that, in October 2025, convinced Japan’s Kurita Water Industries to take exclusive global rights to its technology and become its largest shareholder. So here’s the question worth your time: how does the company that raised the least, and owns nothing, get validated first?

🎧 Built on the podcast This article is the companion to a (don't) Waste Water episode. Listen on Ausha →

Full disclosure before I answer it: I’ve been kicking the tires on Evove for years, since my own LeckerLithium experiments and an earlier conversation with the company, and I bumped into Andrew Walker, their CCO, in Amsterdam, where he invited me up to Newcastle to see the pilot for myself. So I went and stood in the field. But the reason I think this is worth an article rather than just an episode is what the numbers around Evove say once you line them up against everyone else chasing the same prize, which is a view you only get if you’ve been tracking the whole field.

Who’s actually winning the money race in lithium-from-water?

Almost nobody you’d expect. When I sort my direct-lithium-extraction list by capital raised, the top of the table is a wall of American cheques: Lilac Solutions at over $318 million, Energy Exploration Technologies (you’ll know them as EnergyX) at $134 million, then Canada’s Summit Nanotech near $90 million and Mangrove at $85 million. Evove sits a long way down that column at $12.95 million across five rounds since 2018, which puts a British company with one of the most-watched DLE pilots in the world eleventh on my list by money raised.

Capital raised does not equal momentum: Evove raised US$12.95M and won Kurita’s backing, versus Lilac Solutions at US$318.3M.Horizontal lollipop chart, descending. Total capital raised by 17 lithium-from-water companies in US$ millions. Lilac Solutions US$318.3M (US); Energy Exploration Technologies (EnergyX) US$134.2M (US); Summit Nanotech US$89.5M (Canada); Mangrove Lithium US$85M (Canada); Adionics US$31.6M (France); XtraLit US$30M (Israel); International Battery Metals US$24.2M (Canada); Pure Lithium US$19.9M (US); ElectraLith US$19.1M (Australia); Aquafortus US$17M (New Zealand); Evove US$12.95M (UK); Lithios US$10M (US); Seloxium US$8.85M (UK); CleanTech Lithium US$6.4M (UK); WaterCycle Technologies US$5.6M (UK); Salinity Solutions US$2.4M (UK); Geolith US$1.8M (France). Evove, highlighted in gold, raised US$12.95M and owns no lithium asset, yet won Kurita’s exclusive global rights (October 2025), while the two best-funded firms, Lilac Solutions at US$318.3M and EnergyX at US$134.2M, both own a lithium asset. Capital raised does not equal momentum.Capital raised does not equal momentumTotal funding raised by lithium-from-water companies, US$ millions. Evove raised US$12.95M, afraction of leader Lilac Solutions at US$318.3M, yet Evove just won Kurita.Evove (UK)owns a lithium assetother developersUS$0US$100MUS$200MUS$300MLilac Solutions (US), owns a lithium asset: US$318.3M total raisedLilac Solutionsowns a lithium assetUS$318.3MEnergy Exploration Technologies (EnergyX) (US), owns a lithium asset: US$134.2M total raisedEnergyXowns a lithium assetUS$134.2MSummit Nanotech (Canada): US$89.5M total raisedSummit NanotechUS$89.5MMangrove Lithium (Canada): US$85M total raisedMangrove LithiumUS$85MAdionics (France): US$31.6M total raisedAdionicsUS$31.6MXtraLit (Israel): US$30M total raisedXtraLitUS$30MInternational Battery Metals (Canada): US$24.2M total raisedInternational Battery MetalsUS$24.2MPure Lithium (US): US$19.9M total raisedPure LithiumUS$19.9MElectraLith (Australia): US$19.1M total raisedElectraLithUS$19.1MAquafortus (New Zealand): US$17M total raisedAquafortusUS$17MEvove (UK), no lithium asset: US$12.95M total raisedEvoveno lithium asset, won KuritaUS$12.95MLithios (US): US$10M total raisedLithiosUS$10MSeloxium (UK): US$8.85M total raisedSeloxiumUS$8.85MCleanTech Lithium (UK): US$6.4M total raisedCleanTech LithiumUS$6.4MWaterCycle Technologies (UK): US$5.6M total raisedWaterCycle TechnologiesUS$5.6MSalinity Solutions (UK): US$2.4M total raisedSalinity SolutionsUS$2.4MGeolith (France): US$1.8M total raisedGeolithUS$1.8MSource: Leviathan, my water-sector funding database (June 2026).
Evove raised US$12.95M, a fraction of the lithium-from-water leaders such as Lilac Solutions (US$318.3M), yet it just won Kurita’s exclusive global rights (October 2025). Source: Leviathan, my water-sector funding database (June 2026).
The data: lithium-from-water companies by capital raised (Leviathan)
Company Country Total raised (US$M) Owns a lithium asset?
Lilac Solutions United States 318.3 Yes
Energy Exploration Technologies (EnergyX) United States 134.2 Yes
Summit Nanotech Canada 89.5 Not stated
Mangrove Lithium (f/k/a Mangrove Water Technologies) Canada 85.0 Not stated
Adionics France 31.6 Not stated
XtraLit Israel 30.0 Not stated
International Battery Metals Canada 24.2 Not stated
Pure Lithium United States 19.9 Not stated
ElectraLith Australia 19.1 Not stated
Aquafortus New Zealand 17.0 Not stated
Evove (f/k/a G2O Water Technologies) United Kingdom 12.95 No
Lithios United States 10.0 Not stated
Seloxium United Kingdom 8.85 Not stated
CleanTech Lithium United Kingdom 6.4 Not stated
WaterCycle Technologies United Kingdom 5.6 Not stated
Salinity Solutions United Kingdom 2.4 Not stated
Geolith France 1.8 Not stated

Selected DLE / lithium-from-water companies by capital raised. Asset ownership is marked only where confirmed on the show (Lilac, EnergyX) or for Evove; “Not stated” means not assessed here, not “no.” Source: Leviathan, my water-sector funding database (June 2026).

Two things jump out of that table once you sit with it. The first is a quiet naming pattern: a striking number of these companies started life as water businesses and rebranded toward the shinier word. Mangrove Water Technologies became Mangrove Lithium. Evove itself used to be G2O Water Technologies. The water people worked out, before the market did, that brine treatment and lithium extraction are close to the same job. The second is that Britain has quietly grown a whole DLE cluster, because alongside Evove my list carries Seloxium, CleanTech Lithium, WaterCycle Technologies and Salinity Solutions, none of them household names, all working the same seam (I’ve profiled one of them, how Salinity Solutions halves the energy of squeezing water out of any stream).

So why did the smallest serious player win Kurita?

Because Evove made a different bet with its money, and the bet is the story. Look again at the companies above it on the funding table and you’ll notice most of them did the same thing with the cash: they bought a lithium asset, a deposit or a site of their own, so they’d have somewhere to prove the technology and, eventually, a resource to sell (it’s how Standard Lithium and Adionics have played it). Walker is blunt that Evove deliberately refused to play it that way.

“Just about every DLE company except for EVOVE has purchased an asset, a lithium production site of some kind. And Lilac is the same at their site in Utah. And EnergyX have done the same. […] Essentially, we don’t have that luxury. And therefore, being able to partner with a client like we’ve done at Northern Lithium is absolutely essential for us.”

Andrew Walker, CCO, Evove · (don’t) Waste Water S13E5 · hear him say it

Buying a deposit is what turns a $13 million company into a $300 million one, because resources are expensive and slow. Evove stayed a technology licensor instead, selling its membranes and coatings and even its 3D-printing know-how to whoever is building the plant, and partnering with an asset owner (Northern Lithium) rather than becoming one. That’s the difference between a mining mindset and a water one, and it’s the whole reason a small balance sheet could get this far.

Evove funding timeline, 2018 to 2025: seven lean years of small cheques, then Kurita’s strategic roundFive funding rounds for Evove (called G2O Water Technologies until its 2022 rebrand). Nov 2018: US$1.32M (NPIF Maven, Finance Durham Fund). Jul 2020: US$0.75M (NPIF Maven). Aug 2021: US$0.35M (NPIF Maven, lead). Mar 2023: US$6.9M Series A (lead At One Ventures, with AM Ventures and Maven Capital Partners). Oct 2025: US$3.63M strategic round from Kurita Water Industries, which became Evove’s largest shareholder and took exclusive global rights to its direct lithium extraction technology. Total raised about US$12.95M. Source: Leviathan water-sector funding database, June 2026.Evove’s funding: seven lean years, then KuritaDisclosed rounds, 2018 to 2025. Amounts in US dollars (M = million). Bar height = round size.SMALL CHEQUES (as G2O Water Technologies)G2O → Evove2022 rebrandNov 2018: US$1.32M (as G2O Water Technologies). Investors: NPIF Maven, Finance Durham Fund.US$1.32M2018NPIF MavenJul 2020: US$0.75M. Investor: NPIF Maven.US$0.75M2020NPIF MavenAug 2021: US$0.35M. Investor: NPIF Maven (lead).US$0.35M2021NPIF MavenMar 2023: US$6.9M Series A. Lead: At One Ventures, with AM Ventures and Maven Capital Partners.US$6.9M2023Series A, lead At One VenturesOct 2025: US$3.63M strategic round. Kurita Water Industries became Evove’s largest shareholder and took exclusive global rights to its direct lithium extraction (DLE) technology.2025Kurita, strategicUS$3.63M strategic roundThe strategic inflectionKurita Water Industries becomes Evove’slargest shareholder and takes exclusiveglobal rights to its lithium-extraction tech.Total disclosed: about US$12.95M across five rounds.Source: Leviathan, my water-sector funding database (June 2026).
Seven lean years of small cheques as G2O Water Technologies, then Kurita’s US$3.63M strategic round reset Evove’s trajectory in 2025. Source: Leviathan, my water-sector funding database (June 2026).

“We go about it from a water treatment mindset, not from a mining mindset. So to contrast the two: mining, you may see very large plants, usually quite bespoke and customized to a single situation. Water treatment, you tend to see decentralized, smaller, modular, but also scalable systems.”

Andrew Walker, CCO, Evove · (don’t) Waste Water S13E5 · hear him say it

I’ll admit this is catnip for me, because I’ve been arguing a version of it across my whole lithium series, from the evaporation ponds of Salta to the DLE startups you trip over walking through Vancouver: strip away the mystique and direct lithium extraction is a water-treatment plant that happens to output something worth $15,000 a tonne, which is the whole case I’ve made for water technology in lithium.

Does the technology actually deliver?

This is where the muddy field earns its place, because an asset-light story collapses the moment the technology underperforms on someone else’s site. Between January and April 2025, Evove ran a 1:15-scale demonstration plant with Northern Lithium at Ludwell Farm in County Durham, on real brine pumped from under the North Pennines, and the published results held up: up to 92% end-to-end lithium recovery, an intermediate at 96.5% purity, and calcium and magnesium pushed below the 5-parts-per-million line where the instruments stop finding them (Evove, “DELiVERED,” October 2025).

Evove County Durham pilot scorecard: what the technology proved on a partner’s siteKPI scorecard from the Evove and Northern Lithium direct-lithium-extraction demonstration at Ludwell Farm, County Durham, UK, a 1:15-scale plant run on real brine from January to April 2025. Up to 92% end-to-end lithium recovery; 96.5% purity of the intermediate lithium chloride and lithium sulfate; divalent ions calcium and magnesium below 5 ppm detection threshold; 3.5 million litres of brine processed; 1.98 tonnes of Lithium Carbonate Equivalent produced; 78 million data points collected matching Evove’s predictive models; exceeded 300 hours of full-production operation. The takeaway: it ran, at scale, on real brine, and hit its targets.What Evove proved on a partner’s siteIt ran, at scale, on real brine, and hit its targets. The County Durham DLE pilot, by the numbers.Up to 92% end-to-end lithium recovery across the full process chain.UP TO92%End-to-endlithium recovery96.5% purity of the intermediate lithium chloride and lithium sulfate.LITHIUM SALTS96.5%IntermediatepurityDivalent ions (calcium, magnesium) below 5 ppm, the instrument detection threshold.BELOW DETECTION<5ppmCalcium + magnesium(divalent ions)78 million data points collected, matching Evove’s predictive models.MATCHED MODELS78MData pointscollected3.5 million litres of real brine processed.FROM THE FIELD3.5M LReal brineprocessed1.98 tonnes of Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (LCE) produced.PRODUCT OUTPUT1.98tLithium CarbonateEquivalent (LCE)Exceeded 300 hours of full-production operation.CONTINUOUS RUN300h+Full-productionoperationCounty Durham DLE demonstration: Evove + Northern Lithium, Ludwell Farm, 1:15 scale, Jan to Apr 2025.THE PILOT1:15-scale planton a partner’s siteCounty Durham, UKJan to Apr 2025Source: Evove and Northern Lithium, County Durham DLE demonstration (2025).
The County Durham pilot, by the numbers: up to 92% lithium recovery and a 96.5%-pure intermediate, hit at scale on a partner’s brine. Source: Evove and Northern Lithium, County Durham DLE demonstration (2025).

The 96.5% is the number that matters, and here’s why, because it’s easy to skate past a purity figure. Walker reckons the intermediate most DLE outfits publish lands around 80 to 82% pure. Evove came out of this pilot at 96.5%, and that gap is money rather than bragging, because the closer your intermediate starts to battery grade, the less you spend dragging it the rest of the way. One of Evove’s conversion partners put real figures on it: starting from the cleaner Evove stream cut their downstream conversion cost by roughly 25% on capex and 22% on opex.

A cleaner start makes a cheaper finish: Evove’s intermediate is 96.5% pure versus 80 to 82% for the typical DLE field, and reaching battery grade from there costs 25% less capex and 22% less opex.A purity scale from 75% to 100% shows the battery-grade lithium carbonate threshold at 99.5%. The typical direct-lithium-extraction intermediate lands at 80 to 82% purity. Evove’s intermediate at the Northern Lithium pilot reaches 96.5%, far closer to battery grade. Because Evove’s intermediate starts cleaner, an Evove conversion partner reports the downstream step to battery grade needs 25% less capital expenditure and 22% less operating expenditure.A cleaner start makes a cheaper finishLithium intermediate purity vs. the battery-grade thresholdPURITY OF THE INTERMEDIATE (% LITHIUM)75%80%85%90%95%100%Battery grade 99.5%Typical DLE intermediate purity: 80 to 82% (Andrew Walker, citing other companies’ published results)80 to 82%typical DLE field intermediate96.5%Evove intermediate purity at the Northern Lithium pilot: 96.5%EVOVEintermediate at the Northern Lithium pilot3 points shortThat head start cuts the cost of reaching battery gradeConverting the cleaner intermediate to battery grade costs less, per an Evove conversion partner:An Evove conversion partner reports 25% less capital expenditure to reach battery grade25% less capexAn Evove conversion partner reports 22% less operating expenditure to reach battery grade22% less opex
Evove’s pilot intermediate hit 96.5% purity versus the DLE field’s 80 to 82%, a head start a conversion partner says cuts downstream cost by 25% capex and 22% opex. Sources: Evove demonstration results (2025); Andrew Walker on (don’t) Waste Water (S13E5).

How it gets there is the divalent removal up front, stripping the calcium and magnesium out with its nanofiltration membranes before the lithium ever goes for polishing, and that same cleanliness is what lets Evove recycle its water and regenerate its own acids and bases on site, the basis of its zero-water and zero-chemical-footprint claims. One number you may have seen needs a quick correction, though: the 99.1% that’s been attached to this story is the selectivity of Evove’s Separonics membrane on a hexadecane rejection test, not a lithium-purity figure. The membrane is extraordinarily selective, the lithium results are the 92% and the 96.5%, and conflating the two is exactly the kind of thing that makes an investor distrust the rest of your deck. I’d add my usual asterisk to “zero footprint” too, since it’s always more site-specific than a pitch slide admits, but as DLE goes this is the cleanest version I’ve looked at.

Evove’s membrane edge: three measurable engineering levers behind its resultsThree quantified advantages in Evove’s membrane portfolio, each a distinct engineering lever rather than a vague claim. Lever 1, graphene-oxide coating: 20 to 50 percent more water flux (more throughput per unit of pressure), and it resists fouling so it clogs more slowly. Lever 2, 3D-printed spacer plates: 10 to 20 percent lower pressure drop, which means less energy to push each cubic metre of water through. Lever 3, ceramic membranes: run above 100 degrees C and across the full pH range 0 to 14, conditions that destroy ordinary polymer membranes. Source: Leviathan product database; Andrew Walker on (don’t) Waste Water (S13E5).Three levers behind Evove’s membranesNot vague claims: each advantage is a measured, distinct engineering gain.Graphene-oxide coating: 20 to 50 percent more water flux (more throughput per unit of pressure), plus antifouling so the membrane clogs more slowly.LEVER 1Graphene-oxide coating+20 to 50%more water fluxMore water through the samemembrane at the same pressure:higher throughput per unitof pressure.Plus: antifoulingresists the gunk that clogsordinary membranes.3D-printed spacer plates: 10 to 20 percent lower pressure drop, which means less energy to push each cubic metre of water through.LEVER 23D-printed spacer plates-10 to 20%lower pressure dropWater meets less resistanceflowing through, so the pumpswork less to move it.Means: less energylower energy used percubic metre treated.Ceramic membranes: operate above 100 degrees C and across the full pH range 0 to 14, conditions that destroy ordinary polymer membranes.LEVER 3Ceramic membranesabove 100degrees Cand pH 0 to 14survives extremesHot, fully acidic or fullycaustic streams it handles.Where polymers failordinary plastic membranesbreak down in these.Three measurable levers, three different jobs: throughput, energy, and durability.Source: Leviathan product database; Andrew Walker on (don’t) Waste Water (S13E5).
Evove’s membrane edge comes from three measurable engineering levers, not vague claims: 20 to 50% more water flux, 10 to 20% lower pressure drop, and ceramic membranes that run above 100 degrees C across pH 0 to 14. Source: Leviathan product database; Andrew Walker on (don’t) Waste Water (S13E5).

What did Kurita actually buy?

Not a stake, a chokehold. In October 2025 Kurita Water Industries completed an investment that made it Evove’s largest shareholder and, more tellingly, handed it exclusive global rights to use Evove’s DLE technology (Kurita Water Industries, October 2025). In the same announcement, Northern Lithium, Kurita and Evove committed to a three-way plan for commercial UK lithium starting end of 2027, at 500 tonnes a year and ramping past 20,000 tonnes a year by 2035 (PRNewswire, October 2025). So the modular plants get built and manufactured by one of the largest water-treatment companies on earth, while Evove keeps being the technology inside them. For an asset-light licensor, that’s the dream customer, and it’s not the only Japanese name circling: Walker also described an offtake-and-project-finance tie with a trading house he could only call a $100-billion-turnover company.

The commercial ramp the Kurita deal underwrites: from 500 tonnes a year in 2027 to more than 20,000 by 2035Northern Lithium, Kurita and Evove tripartite lithium partnership, announced October 2025. Commercial production starts at the end of 2027 with an initial capacity of 500 tonnes per year of lithium. The plan ramps to more than 20,000 tonnes per year by 2035, a roughly fortyfold increase. The plants are engineered and manufactured by Kurita with Evove’s direct lithium extraction (DLE) technology inside; the exclusive agreement covers at least the first 5,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE). This is a commercial production plan with an industrial backer, not a laboratory result. Source: Northern Lithium, Kurita and Evove partnership announcement, October 2025.A commercial ramp with a backer: 500 to 20,000+ tonnes a yearPlanned lithium output, tonnes per year. Plants by Kurita, with Evove’s DLE technology inside.Underwritten byKurita (plants and manufacturing) and Evove (DLE technology), with Northern Lithium.Exclusive agreement covers at least the first 5,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE).about 40xmore output in eight yearsEnd of 2027: commercial production starts at 500 tonnes per year of lithium.500tonnes per yearend 2027production startsBy 2035: ramp target of more than 20,000 tonnes per year, roughly a fortyfold increase on the 2027 start.20,000+tonnes per yearby 2035ramp targetHeight traces the planned trajectory, not a linear scale; the 40x gap is stated to keep the jump honest.Source: Northern Lithium, Kurita and Evove partnership announcement (October 2025).
The Kurita-backed plan ramps lithium output from 500 tonnes a year at start-up in 2027 to more than 20,000 by 2035, about a fortyfold increase. Source: Northern Lithium, Kurita and Evove partnership announcement (October 2025).

What I’d flag for an investor is the pattern, not the single deal. The serious money entering DLE from the water side is strategic, not venture, with Kurita buying into Evove and Veolia already running DLE membranes at Centenario in Argentina. The water majors have decided lithium is their adjacency, and they’re shopping for the technology rather than building it, which is precisely the exit a company like Evove is built to be.

What could still go wrong?

Plenty, and I’d be selling you the pitch deck if I skipped it. Asset-light cuts both ways: leaning on Northern Lithium and Kurita gets Evove to scale cheaply, but Evove no longer fully controls its own destiny, and Walker himself calls the partner route “a lot more risky.” Manufacturing is the other open question, because he’s refreshingly candid that churning out these 3D-printed ceramic modules at volume is still unproven, and he’s watched additive manufacturing over-promise before. And the capital math hasn’t gone away just because Kurita showed up: water-tech venture money is thin, hardware is unforgiving, and one large strategic backer is not the same as a deep market of investors. Hold the 92% and the 96.5% in one hand and those three in the other.

Why this matters now

Because the supply chain is the whole game. China spent two decades building a near-monopoly on lithium-processing technology and in 2025 began enforcing export curbs on exactly that know-how, which is what turns a working extraction line in a Durham field from a science fair into a strategic asset. Evove’s answer to the obvious objection, that a scattered Western industry can’t catch up, is counter-intuitive and the reason I keep thinking about it.

“We made a public declaration together with what some people might consider competitors in the DLE landscape that we’re all going to work together and unbox the black box and have transparency […] bringing lithium supplies into the marketplace outside of China and using DLE technologies that also rely less on global supply chains.”

Andrew Walker, CCO, Evove · (don’t) Waste Water S13E5 · hear him say it

Three years from now, if Northern Lithium’s commercial plant comes online as planned, it won’t look like a mine. It’ll look like a water-treatment facility that happens to produce one of the most valuable materials on earth, which is either a quietly radical idea or the most obvious one going, depending on whether you came up through mining or through water. You can probably guess which side of that field I was standing on.

The full conversation with Andrew Walker, plus the walk around the Northern Lithium site, is in the episode embedded above. And I dug into the wider water-meets-lithium thesis across my newsletter, if you want the map the rest of this sits on.

Frequently asked questions

What is direct lithium extraction (DLE)?

A family of processes that pull lithium straight out of brine with membranes, sorbents or ion exchange, instead of evaporating brine in ponds for months or mining hard rock. It’s faster and uses far less land and water, which is why the water-treatment industry has moved into it.

What is Evove?

A UK company, formerly G2O Water Technologies, that makes graphene-oxide-coated reverse-osmosis and nanofiltration membranes plus 3D-printed membrane spacers, and applies them to direct lithium extraction and industrial water treatment. Its advanced filtration line is branded Separonics, commercial launch planned for 2026.

What did Evove’s Northern Lithium pilot achieve?

At the County Durham demonstration in early 2025: up to 92% end-to-end lithium recovery, 96.5% purity for the intermediate lithium chloride and sulfate, divalent ions (calcium, magnesium) below 5 parts per million, across more than 300 hours and 78 million data points.

How much has Evove raised, and who backs it?

About $12.95 million across five rounds since 2018, including a $6.9 million Series A in 2023 led by At One Ventures. In October 2025 Kurita Water Industries became its largest shareholder and took exclusive global rights to its DLE technology.

How does Evove compare to other DLE companies?

By capital raised it’s far smaller than leaders like Lilac Solutions (over $300M) or EnergyX (over $130M); it sits about eleventh on my list of forty. Its differentiator is the asset-light model: it licenses technology and partners with asset owners rather than buying lithium deposits of its own.

Is Evove’s lithium battery-grade?

The pilot produced a high-purity 96.5% intermediate; battery-grade lithium carbonate needs 99.5% or above, reached in a downstream conversion step. Evove has separately made around 2 kg of battery-grade lithium carbonate above 99.5% purity at its own test centre.

Who is Andrew Walker?

Evove’s CCO, or Chief Commercial Officer. He came into water from additive manufacturing, which is where the company’s 3D-printing expertise originates.

Sources

  1. Evove, “DELiVERED: onsite demo DLE plant for Northern Lithium,” 2025. evove.tech/dle-onsite-demo (retrieved 30 June 2026).
  2. Kurita Water Industries, “Kurita Advances Strategic Alliance with Evove Ltd.,” 15 October 2025. kurita-water.com.
  3. Northern Lithium / PR Newswire, “Northern Lithium announces partnership with Kurita and Evove,” 15 October 2025. prnewswire.co.uk.
  4. (don’t) Waste Water, S13E5 with Andrew Walker, Evove. youtube.com.